Why The Grass Court Season Should Be Longer



Around this time of the tennis season, many people talk about the ever short grass court season. New Tennis fans who have only followed tennis for maybe 10 years see the grass court season as just another short phase on the ATP World Tour. However, if you look into the past, and into the roots of tennis, you will understand that the grass court season should be extended.

Back in the 1960’s and 70’s, 3 out of the 4 Grand Slams were played on grass. Only the French Open was played on a surface other that grass. Grass courts were elegant, prestigious, and challenging, which made them the most popular surface on tour. As time has gone on, hard courts have taken over as the most popular surface. That is mostly due to the low cost of hard courts, and the little money required to maintain them. Grass courts do need a lot of care and maintenance to keep them in good condition. I’m not suggesting that we go back to having 75% grass courts, but I do think they deserve a bigger portion of the pie that is the ATP World Tour.

When the French Open ends(June 9th), the players get a whopping 2 days to prepare for the grass season. The first two warm up tournaments in Halle and London begin June 10th, giving the players(especially those who go deep at Roland Garros) little to no time to practice on grass. Well, you could then suggest that they just take that week off, and instead practice and enter the next week’s tournament. However, there arises the problem again. Wimbledon starts June 24th, and the second week of warm up tournaments ends June 23rd. So a player could go and play at Eastbourne or Den Bosch, but if you play well then you risk arriving at Wimbledon late and without proper time for preparation.

Wimbledon is the most famous and prestigious tournament in the history of tennis. The first big matches were played there, and its tradition lives on. Ask most players if they could win one tournament, and they would say Wimbledon. So if the biggest tournament of the year is on grass, shouldn’t players have the ability to practice and play enough to perform their best?

Grass is the most different of the 3 surfaces the tour plays on. Grass courts are faster, the ball bounces lower, and long rallies are more rare. This is the opposite of most players game. The majority of today’s top players are baseline grinders. Grass courts are not for baseline grinders. However, if the tour added a couple weeks and a Masters 1000 event into the grass court season, players could work on their front-court game and become better overall players.

So that is my proposition. Add 2 weeks to the grass court season. Give the players a week off after the French Open, and then have the first couple of 250 tournaments played the week after. The next week would be the Masters 1000 event, and then there would be 2 more 250 events the week after that. This would give top players the ability to play 1-2 tournaments in the lead up to Wimbledon.

What do you guys think?


9 thoughts on “Why The Grass Court Season Should Be Longer

  1. Remember that they changed the grass to favor the baseline players. I wish that they would bring back the old faster grass where it was it was a power hitting ace show with Sampras, ivansevic, and Krajicek

    • Yeah I liked the faster grass courts too. I guess it’s slightly understandable that the faster courts led to shorter points are less exciting play though.

  2. I believe that Wimbledon starts a week later next year, so there will be 3 weeks between the FO and Wimby; however, I think an additional week would be even better. The hard courts are hard on the body, so it would be good to cut back on them and replace the NA summer with an extended grass court season.

  3. A month long grass season is not out of the question, much of the North American hard court season are lower lever tourneys, as well as the European tourneys , some on clay , some on hard court . Postponing SW19 would allow for a true grasscourt season to blossom. The grass is a tradition that has been scraped in the name of economy, not because it is antiquated, or uninteresting ! Wimbledon is the most prestigious prize in tennis, and always has been! To reconstruct a true grass court swing could only augment that prestige! That said, a 500 level tournament, would be a start, but an event similar to Monte Carlo might be ideal, where it is not mandatory , but offers the 1000 points and Masters series cache, this would attract the top players and offer a build up to Wimbledon that is surely lacking!

  4. That is a very good tip especially to those fresh to the blogosphere.

    Simple but very accurate information… Thank you for sharing
    this one. A must read article!

  5. Just wish to say your article is as amazing. The clearness in your post is just spectacular
    and i can assume you’re an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission let me to grab your feed to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the gratifying work.

  6. Great post. I’ve always believed that there should be a Masters 1000 grass event. It would be great if Wimbledon was pushed back a couple weeks but who knows if we’ll ever see it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s